Marijuana Should Be Legalized Essay - 929 Words

Marijuana Should Be Legalized. Drugs are a major influential force in our country today. The problem has gotten so out of hand that many options are being considered to control it or solve it. One of the most controversial issues facing our generation is if we should legalize marijuana. Usually, people do not know a great deal about marijuana they just considered it as any other drug. There is one thing people should know is that marijuana is not like the others drugs such as heroine or cocaine. But, marijuana is considered a drug, and in fact is illegal, due to number of reasons. For me, and so the various people who agree, marijuana is exceedingly comparable with other substances that are legal, mainly alcohol and tobacco, in†¦show more content†¦However, those who are against it think â€Å"there will be an increase in people using the drug and therefore a need to increase rehabilitation programs which will come at the cost of taxpayers and the government†. Maybe is right, people can smoke i t everyday. But, we all know that man and women are attracted by taboos, I mean everybody is attracted by forbidden things, especially teenagers. Actually, teenagers like to experiment anything outside the norm of society. If the government decides to legalize it, the physical damage created because of the drug abuse, can be control. Besides, the FDA or others could regulate the quality and safety of drugs. Many drug users become sick or die because of poorly-prepared products. After all, there is nothing to regulate what is sold and no way to sue anyone for product liability. By bringing marijuana into the legitimate business world, you can oversee production and regulate sales. Moreover, concerning business and sales, it could be a source of additional tax revenues. During a debate on that matter, one man said that, â€Å"An enormous amount of money is raised through government taxation of alcohol, cigarettes, and other sins. The legalization of marijuana would create another ite m that could be taxed. Im sure the government would have no problem spending all that extra money†. On the one hand, legalization would mean a lower price; thus, related crimes (like theft) would be reduced.Show MoreRelatedShould Marijuana Be Legalized?849 Words   |  4 Pageswhether marijuana should be legalized. Around 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. In the state of Illinois, medicinal use of marijuana has been passed on April 17, 2013. Since January 2014, patients are able to obtain marijuana with a doctor s recommendation. The new debate is whether marijuana should be legalized for the general public as a recreational drug. Although some believe that marijuana is harmless, and that it has beneficial medicinal uses, marijuana shouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1715 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana in Society Cannabis, formally known as marijuana is a drug obtained from the tops, stems and leaves of the hemp plant cannabis. The drug is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world. Only substances like caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are used more (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). In the U. S. where some use it to feel â€Å"high† or get an escape from reality. The drug is referred to in many ways; weed, grass, pot, and or reefer are some common names used to describe the drug (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). Like mostRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1489 Words   |  6 Pagescannabis plant or marijuana is intended for use of a psychoactive drug or medicine. It is used for recreational or medical uses. In some religions, marijuana is predominantly used for spiritual purposes. Cannabis is indigenous to central and south Asia. Cannabis has been scientifically proven that you can not die from smoking marijuana. Marijuana should be legalized to help people with medical benefits, econo mic benefits, and criminal benefits. In eight states, marijuana was legalized for recreationalRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1245 Words   |  5 PagesMarijuana is a highly debatable topic that is rapidly gaining attention in society today.   Legalizing marijuana can benefit the economy of this nation through the creation of jobs, increased tax revenue, and a decrease in taxpayer money spent on law enforcement.   Ã‚  Many people would outlaw alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, gambling, and tanning beds because of the harmful effects they have on members of a society, but this is the United States of America; the land of the free and we should give peopleRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1010 Words   |  5 PagesThe legalization of marijuana became a heated political subject in the last few years. Twenty-one states in America have legalized medical marijuana. Colorado and Washington are the only states where marijuana can be purchased recreationally. Marijuana is the high THC level part of the cannabis plant, which gives users the â€Å"high† feeling. There is ample evidence that supports the argument that marijuana is beneficial. The government should legalize marijuana recreationally for three main reasonsRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1350 Words   |  6 Pagespolitics in the past decade would have to be the legalization of marijuana. The sale and production of marijuana have been legalized for medicinal uses in over twenty states and has been legalized for recreational uses in seven states. Despite the ongoing support for marijuana, it has yet to be fully legalized in the federal level due to cultural bias against â€Å"pot† smoking and the focus over its negative effects. However, legalizing marijuana has been proven to decrease the rate of incrimination in AmericaRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1231 Words   |  5 Pagesshows the positive benefits of marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law. In recent years, numerous states have defied federal law and legalized marijuana for both recreational and medicinal use. Arizona has legalized marijuana for medical use, but it still remains illegal to use recreationally. This is absurd, as the evidence gathered over the last few decades strongly supports the notion that it is safer than alcohol, a widely available substance. Marijuana being listed as a Schedule I drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Essay1457 Words   |  6 PagesSHOULD MARIJUANA BE LEGALIZED? Marijuana is a drug that has sparked much controversy over the past decade as to whether or not it should be legalized. People once thought of marijuana as a bad, mind-altering drug which changes a person’s personality which can lead to crime and violence through selling and buying it. In the past, the majority of citizens believed that marijuana is a harmful drug that should be kept off the market and out of the hands of the public. However, a recent study conductedRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1596 Words   |  7 Pages But what needs to be known before a user can safely and completely make the decision if trying Marijuana is a good idea? Many do not want the drug to be legalized because they claim that Cannabis is a â€Å"gateway drug†, meaning it will cause people to try harder drugs once their body builds up a resistance to Marijuana, because a stronger drug will be needed to reach a high state. This argument is often falsely related to the medical si de of the debate over legalization. It is claimed that this wouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?985 Words   |  4 PagesLegalize Marijuana Despite what people believe about marijuana, it hasn’t once proved to be the cause of any real issue. It makes you wonder what the reason as to why there is a war on drugs. Why is marijuana the main concern? Since the time that alcohol and tobacco became legal, people wonder why marijuana isn’t legal yet. The fact that marijuana is illegal is mainly caused by the amount of money, jobs, and pride invested in the drug war. Once the government starts anything, they stick to it. At

William Shakespeare s Hamlet - 1016 Words

Robin Talukder Mr.Chalmers ENG4UO June 12th 2015 Hamlet s Downward Spiral to Insanity through Unique Soliloquies The true soliloquy is a speech that an actor delivers alone onstage to either himself or an audience.. In William Shakespeare Hamlet, Hamlets soliloquies appears to generally reveal that he is pure but that he has adapted impulsive behaviour and enters his downfall into mental instability. Nonetheless, the soliloquies and set speeches have a fulfillment of place revealing much about Hamlet and his overall development in character. The first soliloquy is on Act 1, Scene 5, Lines 92-112. It is right after the ghost of Hamlet’s father leaves having charged hamlet with the duty of taking the revenge upon the murderer of his†¦show more content†¦Hamlet now refers to his mother as the â€Å"most pernicious woman† and to his uncle as a villain, a â€Å"smiling damned villain†. The second soliloquy is located on Act 1, Scene 2, Lines 129-59. This is after Queen Gerturde and King Claudius recommends Hamlet in the open court to throw off the deep sorrow, a tragic consequence of grieving his father s death which has lead him to obsession as well. Queen Gerturde and King Claudius believe that hamlet has abundantly suffered enough from the loss of his father. Before the soliloquy, Queen Gertrude and King announce their marriage and they think the court couldn t handle any more extra grief which upset Hamlet even more. The soliloquy gives evidence of Hamlets strong love for his dearest father and how important he was in his life. Furthermore, it shifts it s focus on the character of the dead, giving the presumption that he was an affectionate husband and a very admirable father. This soliloquy also points out that Queen Gerturde decides to marry King Hamlet s brother rather quickly, not taking into account that it may be too soon and ignoring a respectable time frame. Hamlet blames his mother for her lack of delay and he is worried about her having fallen to incestuous sheets [1.2.159]. His view to his mother, his dead father and his new father are all made understandable to the audience at this point. However, readers may guess mythical characters. His referral to the

Leadership And Change study of Artlink Australia †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Leadership And Change Artlink Australia. Answer: Introduction There is the need for organizations to endure changes that may be significant as well as traumatic so as to be able to survive in the business environment which is both dynamic and competitive. In the implementation of organizational change leadership plays some very crucial role. Leadership is defined as a process of influencing others so as to make them understand or even agree with whatever needs to be done and the manner in which it should be done as well as the process which facilitates collective and individual efforts needed to accomplish any shared objectives (Burnes and Jackson, 2011). Change is the fundamental and reorientation in the manner in which something or an organization operates. Body: Change management as a key element of leadership Relationship between change and leadership Many organizations have been affected by change which is a very challenging area. Such changes have to endure by organizations so as to survive in the business environment which is dynamic and competitive (Hughes et al., 2009). Any change has to be in alignment with the vale and culture of the organization and this in the end encourages desired results. To make change a success the leadership plays key roles. The transformation that comes with change is difficult and can easily result in things like resentment and resistance from employees. The change process is also affected by the fear of change that could be psychological or social especially if there is no technical expertise in handling this (Burnes and By, 2011). For the strategic change to be effective leaders have to be equipped with good skills. Themanagement also has to live with the fact that change is inevitable and they are the ones responsible in ensuring they overcome the resistance from employees as a result of change. This is achieved via change oriented leadership and sound management. Organizational change is mostly affected by changes in technology, globalization, andmanagement of knowledge and collaboration that is cross boundary. The change may be felt in the macro or external environment. In order to adapt to change organizations need visionaries that are innovative and creative (Rhodes et al., 2010). Any leader that needs to be effective must possess vision and purpose and should be able to manage people in situations that are tough, be able to motivate employees in achieving of goals and take responsibility as well as be accountable for the running of the organization. Believing in leaders come with excitement and this drives them in achieving targets. This indicates that a strong relationship exists between change and leadership. The role played by leadership is huge when it comes to reducing the resistance that comes with change and this ensures smooth implementation of change. Approaches to different Types of strategic change The main and first step in identifying change in a situation is whether this change is needed or not. In a situation where change is needed then one needs to clearly state the type of change needed. Change in any organization can be a big bang change or an incremental one. In a nut shell change can be as a result of the extent as to which its needed and the speed at which it should be applied. In regards to the extent it can be transformational or realignment and in terms of speed it can be incremental or big bang (Den Hond and Bakker, 2007). A change is referred to being incremental if its build on beliefs, skills or routines that bring efficiency. The big bang change occurs only on some occasions for instance in cases of crises. Extent of change Transformational realignment Evolution: this is a change that has to be implemented in a gradual way using initiatives that are inter- related. Its more of a proactive change with the future in mind. Adaptation: this change works on realigning the way an organization is supposed to work. Its implemented in a step wise manner Revolution: simultaneous initiatives are carried out when it comes to transformational change. It could be forced due to the competitive environment faced by the organization. Reconstruction: this is done as a realignment of how an organization operates with the smooth implementation o initiatives. Could be forced du e to changincompetitive context. Means of managing the changes Communication and education; these are the reasons and means for strategic change. The manner in which communication and education of strategic change is done is very key in managing the changes (Cohen and Keren, 2008). The needed change could end up being ineffective if there is some ineffective communication and misinformation. Participation and collaboration; all those that may be affected by change have to be involved in making strategic changes. They assist in the identification of issues, agendas and decisions needed. This assists in the increase of commitment and ownership of the changes (Rhodes et al., 2010). Intervention; this is where one has to coordinate and get authority on the changes that are to be made. The control is retained by the agent of change via interventions. Blockages and facilitators of change Blockages Fear of the unknown; change in an organization is investable and has positive effects on any business. However some people fear to embrace change because they are not aware of what the change will bring and so they tend to resist. Ineffective leadership; for any change to embraced by employees the leaders have to be in the forefront of ensuring this change is affected (Dunphy et al., 2007). Change begins with leaders and how they express their need for change to the employees matters a lot when it comes to embracing change. Broken communication; communication is important when change has to be effected in any organization and any broken or ineffective communication leads to poor adoption of changes for the betterment of the organization. Undue complexity; embracing change in huge organization can be a complex task and requires lengthy processes (Hughes et al., 2009).The scale and complexity of the change plan in itself can be a blockage for effective change in any organization. The challenge may seem too daunting to take on. Facilitators of change Managementfunctions; when the functions of management are to change, then change are inevitable for instance if the board of directors is changed or some exit then strategic change has to be embraced (Macleod and By, 2009). The existing strategies may have to be reviewed by the incoming management team. New ideas may be needed to take the businesses to the next level. Structural transformations; there may be need for the changes in the structure of an organization such as mergers, expansion to other markets which may call for realignment and strategic change. These transformations are meant to bring some alterations in the management and therefore the changes are inevitable. Competition; n many organizations competition from other businesses has always called for change. This is because urgent reviews of their working strategies are usually needed to keep up with the competitive business world (By, 2010). Socio-cultural factors; when such factors for the target market changes then the organization has to embrace change so that the strategic orientation of the business is clearly realigned to the changes in such factors. Laws; changes related to laws in terms of taxation, environment etc influences changes within an organization so as to work in line with the new changes on the laws that affect their business operations (Burnes and By, 2011). Technology; this may trigger changes in line with the inadequacy of presence of some form of technology. There may be need for acquisition of capital resources etc. Force field analysis sample in relation to change Source: Google images Different leadership styles for managing change The main types of leadership styles aimed at managing change include; Coercive style; such style of leadership expects a form of immediate compliance from the people they are leading. Such leaders are competent in achieving different results. This is best fit in crisis situations where change is required quickly. Its the least effective form of leadership because of the speed in which it operates. Authoritative style; this style is used by a leader that guides others in achieving avision and ensures the goals and strategies of the organization are followed (Kakabadse et al., 2007). Those being led are allowed to be innovative and take risks that lead to a sense of belonging. Its best fit in situations where change is needed in case of a new vision. Affiliation style; this is a human friendly leadership style. It creates harmony and also enables emotional bonds to be built. It considers communication as a key element and peoples opinions matters a lot. It motivates people in stressful situations. Democratic style; this leadership allows people to be participative and air their opinions (ABS, 2010). Trust, respect and commitment are built by the leader. Its good for a leader who is uncertain when it comes to decision making. Pace setting style; this leadership enables people to be ready for the future. High standards are set by the leader and people are expected to follow. Excellence is demanded and this may make employees feel overstretched beyond their capabilities. This is necessary if results needed are urgent. Coaching styles; this is where leaders aim at training others for future leadership. The employees are assisted to develop their skills. Its least used by leaders due to lack of time for the coaching sessions. Lassies faire; in this style of leadership, leaders influence members on a minimal scale. The responsibilities of a leader are shared uniformly (Burnes, 2009). Its effectiveness is reliant to good team work spirit and interpersonal relationships. Conclusion Leadership and change are inseparable. For any change to be effective and have positive impact on the growth of any organization then leadership styles have to be good. Good leaderships ensure a smooth transition and acceptance of change by the involved parties. References Den Hond, F. and Bakker, F.G. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: how activist groups nfluence corporate social change activities, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp.901924. Burnes, B. (2009) Reflections: ethics and organisational change time for a return to Lewinian values, Journal of Change Management, 9(4), pp. 359381. Association of Business Schools (2010) ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide, version 4 (London: ABS). Burnes, B. and By, R.T. (2011) Leadership and change: the case for greater ethical clarity, ournal of Business Ethics (published online 2 November 2011, doi 10.1007/s10551-011- 1088-2). Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., Clegg, S. R. (2010). If I Should Fall From Grace: Stories of change and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 535551. By, R. T. (2010). Journal of change management: 10 years on. Journal of Change Management,10(1), 13. Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N., Lee-Davies, L. (2007). Three temptations of leaders.Leadership Organization Development Journal, 28(3), 196208. Burnes, B. and Jackson, P. (2011) Success and failure in organisational change: an exploration of the role of values, Journal of Change Management, 11(2), pp. 33162. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (2nd ed.). Routledge: London. Macleod, C. and By, R.T. (2009) Organizational change management in public services: key findings and emerging themes, in: R.T. By and C. Macleod (eds) Managing Organizational Change in Public Services: International Issues, Challenges and Cases, pp. 241249 (Routledge, UK: Milton Park). Cohen, A., Keren, D. (2008). Individual values and social exchange variables: Examining their relationship to and mutual effect on in-role performance and organizational citizenship behaviour. Group Organization Management, 33(4), 425452. Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., Curphy, G. J. (2009). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

The Purpose Of This Paper Is To Offer An Analysis Of The Women Charact

The purpose of this paper is to offer an analysis of the women characters in the works of John Steinbeck, with a special emphasis placed on Elisa Allen, the main character in his short story, "The Chrysanthemums." Most of Steinbeck's fiction is concerned with his native California, with the Great Depression and how people endured it, and with the deprivation that farm workers in the west suffered generally (Beegel et al. 54). Many of his novels and short stories take place in the Salinas area, and his characters often reflect the values of the working people--a people willing to work hard, required to endure adversity, and simple in their needs and lifestyles. Steinbeck's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, The Grapes of Wrath (1939) perhaps epitomizes this primary concern with "the people" and the land and how they lived their lives as farmers working the land ("Steinbeck" 2). This essay will offer a very short biographical sketch of Steinbeck, bringing out the themes that seemed to concern him the most. It will then examine three women characters from his other works, including Ma Joad and Rose from The Grapes of Wrath, (1939), and Ruth Tiflin, Jody's mother in "Leader of the People," (1945). These women characters have been selected because they help us to set the character of Elisa Allen into a context which emphasizes both her similarities to other Steinbeck women characters and those traits which make her distinctive as a ?Steinbeck woman.' It will be argued that Elisa Allen's appearance, actions, and speech depict some typical frustrations of a woman during Steinbeck's time, but that she is unique in her attempts to liberate herself from Steinbeck's typically masculine world (Renner 306). As such, Elisa Allen is Steinbeck's attempt to explore the authentic woman and her world, with all of its frustrations and yearnings for a freer existence. Steinbeck spent the Great Depression in a house given to him by his father in Pacific Grove, California, where he survived by living on the land. From this vantage point, he composed his first successful novel, Tortilla Flats (1935), a warmly humorous, episodic treatment of the lives of the Mexican-Indian-Caucasian mix people?the paisanos?who lived in the Salinas Valley and whose earthy, uninhibited lives provided a colorful contrast to the valley's more "respectable" society (Timmerman 84). Thus began a career of attending to the plights and concerns of the workers, and the themes of the workers vs. the bosses, townspeople vs. country people, and past vs. present. Steinbeck is concerned with the simple people who farm the lands, struggling to find a place for themselves in the world. His characters "glow with life," ("John Steinbeck Page") and reflect the simple passions of simpler times. Life is hard for these people, and the women are no exception. A perhaps typical ?Steinbeck woman' is Ma Joad, the mother of the family traveling west in The Grapes of Wrath. Ma Joad's strength is apparent in her muscular build, and in her actions and attitudes. Her strength is for her family, and she uses it to encourage them. For example, on the road, Ma Joad says to her starving children: "I'm gonna set this kettle out, an' you'll all get a little tas', but it ain't gonna do you no good. I can't he'p it. Can't keep it from you." (Grapes ). Her strengths are marshaled to help her family immigrate west. In contrast, we have Rose, abandoned by her husband Connie. Her baby is stillborn, "dropped dead," typical of the women too weak to endure the hardships of a life of deprivation. Ma Joan and Rose offer a stark contrast to each other, and help us to understand the kinds of women who populate Steinbeck's fiction. On the one hand, there are the "salt of the earth" women, the strong women who care about their men and who help them. On the other, the re are women who are too weak, psychologically or physically, to endure. Their kind is typically disdained by both the stronger women characters, and by the men. In "The Leader of the People," Ruth Tiflin, Jody's mother, is another ?Steinbeck woman.' Like Ma Joad, she uses her physical strength and her psychological insights to endure hardships and to fight for